The
final video delivers to the original brief given to us; it is between 2 and 4 minutes long, includes a
range of projects with both text and visuals. Text is used to accompany each
project outlining what it is as well as providing facts about the
photographs the client gave us. The video complies to the brief by raising
awareness about the different projects which are represented in a fun and
interesting way designed to entice visitors to become involved; some of the
projects feature people in a range of ages taking part which will encourage
others to follow suit. Also, the feedback we received from the client
after initial viewings was very positive; they agreed with the style and
purpose and were pleased that it encouraged others to become involved and seek
out more information.
The
video was exported as an AVI file per the client's request; this is because the
video will be embedded on their website and thus, by using the most universal
file type, they can guarantee their customers will have access to watch the
video from all platforms - PC, laptop, Mac, mobile phones and tablets. It is proven that AVI is the most compatible file
type. The video has an aspect ratio of 16:9, because the majority of screens
are now built in this ratio (with 4:3 being used less and less).
As
a group we decided to film each project separately but as such we had to take
into consideration differences in filming technique and abilities. We believed that each others' filming styles were
of a consistently high level and when edited together the difference would be
less noticeable, providing the same song was used in the background to assist
editing. The whole video includes 4 projects and we decided to compile the
video by combining individual edits of each project into one main video, edited
to the beat of a royalty free song. As projects became available and dates
were booked we organised who would do which project; one main factor in
deciding who would do which was the location of the projects – as not everyone
can yet drive we had to agree on who would be able to get to which project the easiest.
By
separating into groups for projects we could focus on how each 30 second
project video would look. We completed
shot lists and story boards to provide a basic outline of shots however knew
that these could change when we got to the location and had a better
understanding of what would be there to film. We worked very well as a main
group with people taking on different roles within the small groups. In each of these small groups we took
different roles for completing the necessary paperwork before the day of
filming. We used each weekly session to reconvene, assess progress, share experiences
and, during pre-production, complete the paperwork. This allowed us to focus on filming whilst on location and leave post-production
free to edit.
To
film the video we used the Sony SD cameras, set to film in HD. This meant the video
would be of a high quality ensuring it would retain desired the
look and feel regardless of how it was being viewed. The editing software
used was Adobe Premiere Pro; this software automatically recognises the
file type the cameras film in - AVCHD as well as allowing us to export
the video as an AVI file type. As a group we worked very well together,
delegating through agreement the key tasks which were shared as evenly as
possible. We aimed for 3 people per
project group however there were times where some people were required to do more
than others. That said, because we spent
time planning and agreeing the processes to follow we all worked well and
supported each other with tasks in both pre-production, filming and post-production.
To
overcome any potential legal problems we could face in the
future we ensured we had location agreement contracts signed for each
location at each project; we also had artist release contracts signed for
anyone who appeared on camera to demonstrate our compliance to professional
standards. (If, after publication, people who are shown on screen complain, we could
use the signed forms which clearly states their consent for the videos to be
uploaded to the internet and social media).
For
filming to take place in at the Tees Barrage a filming license was completed by
Canal and River Trust to allow us to film and we were given a copy of this
document. There was no budget or financial aid available so, as mentioned
previously, careful consideration was needed when deciding who would film which
project; as students we have a free bus pass to take us to Stockton but from
here any additional bus journeys would need to be paid for by the students themselves.
(The promotional video is not for profit therefore anyone involved was not
paid, no one received payment for featuring in the video nor did a location,
and members of the public willingly took part in the video and projects).
As
a group we assigned Danniella to be the overall project/production manager; she
was in charge of regular communicating with the client, receiving the assets
and distributing to the project leaders and ensuring everyone knew what was
happening, when and whom was doing what. She was a very confident and capable
PM and instilled confidence in everyone associated with the project. Within my small group we didn't have a dedicated
leader, on set the 3 of us all decided on shots and in pre and post everything
was shared equally with each of us knowing what had been done and what was
still left to be done. The weekly meetings were used for each small group to
provide their own updates and then, as a collective group, we could discuss the
progress towards the client’s requirements. I would say there were very few
problems with communication.
The
client gave us a lengthy time scale which was perfect as it gave us plenty
of time to film multiple projects and then agree on the optimum number needed.
The majority of pre and post production was conducted in the weekly 3 hour
meetings therefore the longer time scale was useful as we could spend time
ensuring everything was completed to the best ability and then we could
undertake peer review and critique before moving on. As the project
started we met with the client to go over the brief and understand fully how
they wanted the video to look and which projects of the 21 would be included.
We had the first draft ready on time for the feedback meeting with the client,
at which point we took a temperature check to ensure we were still on track
with their ideas and could agree the final deadines. For future tasks of a
similar nature it is important to communicate with the client so that the video
can be made to exactly what they want and be appropriate for their desired use.
Danniella is a very good leader and I would suggest her to lead future projects
as everyone was involved and listened to her whilst still being independent and
using initiative to carry out tasks.
During
the meeting with the client we received extensive feedback about the first
draft of the video; they really liked the video especially the music and the
pace and tempo it created. They pointed out particular shots they specifically liked
(which helped us to appreciate their style and preferences) but overall they
enjoyed the range of shots we provided.
They agreed with and approved the people and locations we used in the
video and were confident that overall it promoted River Tees Rediscovered
really well. We agreed on a small number of improvements to make; the majority being
the use of logos - the River Tees Rediscovered logo had been changed and
they also needed us to put other logos of companies, partners and charities who
are involved.
As
a group we gave feedback on the overall video; as we were looking at this from
a filmmakers point of view we found more small things to change including
adding transitions, changing one or two shots, lengthening the time the photos
were on screen and adjusting the sound in the interview. The feedback is very
important to ensuring the client gets what the best possible video but also
helps us learn and improve our skills and ability, therefore affecting our
ability for future projects.
Overall
the group, the client and myself believe the video is very suitable for the
client and is of a professional and industry standard.
No comments:
Post a Comment