The first interview I conducted was with Dr
Dacombe, this took place at her house (it wasn’t possible to be filmed in her
GP practice due to not having permission from the British Medical Council
to film there). At first, she looked directly at the camera (because I was
stood over it) but when I moved further away she was able to relax and answer
the questions more naturally. Myself and Matthew set up the tripod however after
looking at the footage it seems too low; the framing was fine but the subject,
Dr Dacombe, is looking too high (at where I was). This could have been resolved if someone
was physically behind the camera checking how the scene looked when filming and
since I was asking the questions I could not do both; this is something
I have learnt and will remember for the future. Matthew was the boom
operator and sound technician – we used quite a large, well furnished room which
meant there was little chance for echo or ambient distortion and the sound that
was recorded was great and useable.
I conducted the interview with the parents of Baby
E in their home living room; I chose this location as it was an informal and
comfortable location suited to the couple sharing details about their child's
condition and dealing with it. The overall interview went really well; at first
the couple were giggly and not focused because of being filmed however they
calmed down and we were able to conduct the interview. Baby E was calm sitting
on her mother's knee throughout, she did not disrupt the interview only making
typical baby noises which added to the natural feel of the film. I used stable
natural light from the window, seating the contributors so that the light
source was from the side but not shining directly onto their faces, this was
done so that the documentary can look professional. One unforeseen challenge
was that I had to record with the camera on charge (prior to the interview I
filmed some cutaways of Baby E to use and as such the camera battery was low);
by filming with the camera on charge a background 'white noise' or low level electric
hum can be heard and as I am unable to re film the interview I will try and fix
the sound in post-production.
For this documentary I collected a range of clips
and photographs, some from the parents (mainly photographs documenting Baby E’s
early months) and some filmed by myself. There is an inconsistency in the
quality and style of the shots as some were filmed on the college's DSLR, some
were filmed with the college's Sony SD camera (those filmed in the 2 days I had
use of the camera) and some were filmed on personal cameras. The main challenge
was that those filmed on my personal cameras weren't as high quality, there
were instances of some footage slipping in & out of focus and some of the
shots were grainy. Because of this a number of them were unusable therefore
limiting the range and variety of shots I had to draw on. Also, a number of ideas
I had planned to film could not take place or be used as Baby E was
uncooperative - being either tired or upset; this is something I took into consideration
when planning which is why I had a number of days set aside for filming. (Children
& babies can not always be expected to ‘act’ on cue, an experience I had learned
while making my Christmas advert starring my two young cousins).
On one of the main days of planned shooting I had an
issue with lighting; filming was taking place in the late afternoon
on a grey, dark day therefore artificial lighting needed to be used,
however the light I had available was not quite strong enough resulting in some
shots on my personal camera going in and out of focus. There was also a dull yellow/orange tint meaning
many of these shots could not be mixed into the overall project. Unlike their
photos, I sadly could not use any video footage the parents had collected
as this was filmed on their mobile phones in portrait aspect meaning they
couldn't be added to the overall film (which was to be published in 16:9) without
the need for black bars to fill the space.
This would have interrupted the flow of the film cutting between
portrait and landscape and would have made the documentary look less
professional. I managed to record some footage of Baby E going swimming using
my GoPro, I spoke to the location in advance who gave permission for
footage to be recorded only of those in our party, providing I did not film
anyone else – this meant I was able to use the great footage of Baby E
kicking and enjoying the water.
I sorted the
footage into bins - one for interview footage, one for photos collected from
the parents and took by myself on the DSLR, one for the GoPro swimming
footage, one for shots of Baby E, one for shots relating to her feet and boots
and bars and one bin for the shots I deemed unusable.
I started editing
by importing the main interviews and cutting them into the separate
questions/answers; I decided to start with Dr Dacombe introducing herself
and explaining the nature and background of the condition of talipes. I used a jump-cut to remove me asking the
question, and whilst it is slightly noticeable as her head moves I tried to
keep any stutter as minimal as possible. I then added the parents' introduction
about themselves and Baby E so the audience would know who everyone was early
in the film. Overtop of the dialogue I used
cutaways of photographs to illustrate what was being discussed - in this interview
photos of Baby E in SCBU (Special Care Baby Unit). To break up the questions I used footage and
photographs timed to the background music I had chosen.
The answers to my
questions all followed a similar format of including relevant footage and
photographs while the contributors are talking. When conducting the interview
with Dr Dacombe there was only one question I did not ask. This was because during the prep time she had
admitted to not knowing the answer in detail and, as we both wanted her
contribution to be as accurate as possible we agreed that a part answer could
be construed as being incorrect – I felt this was really important both to
ensure Dr Dacombe felt she could trust me and to protect the integrity of the
documentary – as the producer I needed to ensure the accuracy and reputation of
the content was of paramount importance.
When editing the
parents' interview I had some challenges in completely editing out all of my
questions - some of the parents’ answers did not directly reference the
question meaning their comments could be confusing to the audience. Some of the
questions I had asked through passive listening were cut as they were not
relevant; some were to do with Baby E's
time in SCBU and one in particular was about how physiotherapy worked (although
part of her life, physiotherapy is not always suggested for babies with talipes
and as I wanted to try and keep the documentary relatable to all parents of
children with this condition I resolved to only include the main treatment information
and details). Since some of the questions were asked to both contributors I was
able to cut some of what each said so that the information could be given
without it being repeated.
When I had the skeleton framework and layout of the
documentary sequence I needed to try and fix the sound from the parents'
interview. I used the internet to search for a solution and found suggestions to
use a noise reduction effect. I tried to
find the best sound and whilst through headphones the ‘power hum’ does not
sound good, playing it out loud it is less noticeable. I will use this
as a learning experience and remember for next time I'm filming.
After I had most of the questions edited I
chose a song for the introduction and to sit underneath the question and answer
breaks. I found an upbeat song with a
good tempo and clear beat that leant itself to edit to; it feels like
footsteps, reminding me of a baby walking and is very fitting for the
documentary which is all about feet. I purposefully chose royalty free music so
that I could upload the video onto YouTube without any copyright or licence
issues.
I asked Kelly to review the first cut of Footprints and I made changes based on her feedback. One was to make the music fade in and out underneath the dialogue so that it doesn't immediately come in after the speaking ends. Another change was to make the images and video cutaways fade in and out so that there wasn't a harsh/sudden cut, especially as some images had used a white border to make up the extra space around them. I fine edited the shots and checked all the photos so that they were of the best quality possible but I also accepted that part of the feel of the film was to show how the parents were recording their baby’s journey, using their own photos taken on mobile phones.
I have permission and will upload the video to
YouTube and then send to people with a questionnaire (compiled on Survey
Monkey) so that I can have feedback from the target audience. I will also upload
the video to a number of Facebook pages and groups about talipes which will
have the biggest selection of my target audience. After receiving the audience feedback I will
write up the results and post my overall conclusion of the project.
No comments:
Post a Comment